subject
Social Studies, 31.03.2021 17:30 ctyrector

THE LONG PART IS JUST THE STORY. PLEASE HURRY Memories of a Memory

Have you ever witnessed something amazing, shocking or surprising and found when describing the event that your story seems to change the more you tell it? Have you ever experienced a time when you couldn't really describe something you saw in a way that others could understand? If so, you may understand why some experts think eyewitness testimony is unreliable as evidence in scientific inquiries and trials. New insights into human memory suggest human memories are really a mixture of many non-factual things.

First, memory is vague. Imagine your room at home or a classroom you see every day. Most likely, you could describe the room very generally. You could name the color of the walls, the floors, the decorations. But the image you describe will never be as specific or detailed as if you were looking at the actual room. Memory tends to save a blurry image of what we have seen rather than specific details. So when a witness tries to identify someone, her brain may recall that the person was tall, but not be able to say how tall when faced with several tall people. There are lots of different kinds of "tall."

Second, memory uses general knowledge to fill in gaps. Our brains reconstruct events and scenes when we remember something. To do this, our brains use other memories and other stories when there are gaps. For example, one day at a library you go to quite frequently, you witness an argument between a library patron and one of the librarians. Later, when telling a friend about the event, your brain may remember a familiar librarian behind the desk rather than the actual participant simply because it is recreating a familiar scene. In effect, your brain is combining memories to help you tell the story.

Third, your memory changes over time. It also changes the more you retell the story. Documented cases have shown eyewitnesses adding detail to testimony that could not have been known at the time of the event. Research has also shown that the more a witness's account is told, the less accurate it is. You may have noticed this yourself. The next time you are retelling a story, notice what you add, or what your brain wants to add, to the account. You may also notice that you drop certain details from previous tellings of the story.

With individual memories all jumbled up with each other, it is hard to believe we ever know anything to be true. Did you really break your mother's favorite vase when you were three? Was that really your father throwing rocks into the river with you when you were seven? The human brain may be quite remarkable indeed. When it comes to memory, however, we may want to start carrying video cameras if we want to record the true picture.

Which line from the text most clearly explains the main idea of the final paragraph?

With individual memories all jumbled up

It is hard to believe we ever know anything

The human brain may be quite remarkable indeed

We may want to start carrying video cameras

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:00
How did the british react to the ninety-two resolution? why
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
Charles schenck was a u.s. citizen and private in the army. while in military training during world war i, schenck printed and passed out leaflets explaining why he was against the draft (required military service). he was charged with violating the espionage act of 1917, a federal law outlawing any action interfering with military operations. schenck believed the espionage act violated his right to free speech. in which court would this case ultimately be decided, and why? a state criminal court, because schenck was accused of violating a criminal law a military tribunal, because the matter involved members of the military a county civil court, because it involved violation of a civil liberty the u.s. supreme court, because schenck challenged whether the law was constitutional
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
Because they are located downstream from turkey on the tigris and euphrates rivers, these two nations are anticipating a reduction in water supply, as a result of 22 dams being built by the southeastern anatolia project. the two nations are a) iraq and iran. b) iraq and syria. c) iran and syria. d) saudi arabia and yemen.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:50
Mike and his wife, amanda, are arguing about his in-laws. mike doesn’t want them to visit because they fight all the time when they come to the house and he is worried about the effect that their fighting is having on mike and amanda’s children. amanda finally yells out: “what about our fighting? ” mike replies, “well, that’s different. we fight because we’re having a disagreement, they fight because they hate each other! ” this is an example of
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
THE LONG PART IS JUST THE STORY. PLEASE HURRY Memories of a Memory

Have you ever witness...
Questions
question
English, 31.10.2021 06:00
question
Mathematics, 31.10.2021 06:00
question
Mathematics, 31.10.2021 06:00
question
Mathematics, 31.10.2021 06:00
question
Chemistry, 31.10.2021 06:00
question
Mathematics, 31.10.2021 06:00
question
Biology, 31.10.2021 06:10
Questions on the website: 13722363