Social science experiments reveal that even though the French government does not collect information on race, Group of answer choices

job applications with Arab or North African sounding names were less likely to be called for interviews.

schools and neighborhoods are still organized by rigid local identification of people according to their racial category.

there are still many examples of how much French citizens primarily identify themselves in terms of race.

French citizens strongly prefer that this information be collected in future census collections.

"when parents are their children are likely to react in a concerned way to the distress of others. warm and sensitive permissive authoritarian attentive, but discourage emotional expressiveness"

Based on what you read in the fact sheet, identify the type of customer the company is hoping to reach. super-phonic systems wants to sell phones to customers who: expect the latest smartphone technology. need affordable phone service in remote areas. care more about attractive designs than reliability. will pay top prices for features such as web-surfing.

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?