subject
Social Studies, 09.04.2021 01:30 toot3715

What was the impact of the Supreme Court's 1803 ruling in Marbury v. Madison? A.
It gave states the right to nullify acts of Congress.
B.
It expanded the constitutional powers of the executive branch.
C.
It aided the Federalist Party’s efforts to control the judicial branch.
D.
It changed the balance of power among the three branches of the government.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:30
Why are committees necessary in congress?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:20
Which of the following discoveries would be most likely to cause a scientific paradigm shift? a. the discovery of more rings around uranus b. the discovery of a new pathogenic virus transmitted by mosquitoes c. the discovery that a dormant volcano is showing signs of activity d. the discovery of a new species of salamander in the amazon rainforest e. the discovery that excess heat is radiating from the center of the earth and causing global climate change
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31
What obstacles did jen bricker face early in life?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
What was the impact of the Supreme Court's 1803 ruling in Marbury v. Madison? A.
It gave stat...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 14.04.2020 22:55
question
Mathematics, 14.04.2020 22:55
Questions on the website: 13722360