Do you agree or disagree with the supreme court’s majority ruling in yarborough v. alvarado? write a short paragraph describing your answer and connect the case to the miranda v. arizona decision.

I would have to agree with the Supreme Court's majority ruling in the Yarborough v. Alvarado case mostly because of the circumstances in which the case developed. Bearing in mind that Alvarado was not told by the police he had the right to remain silent at any time (required by Miranda v. Arizona (384 U.S. 486 (1966) also known as a Miranda Warning) and also taking into account that he was only seventeen years old at the time, it could be argued that he genuinely did not know that he was being held in custody and therefore he felt taken advantage of after the Trial Court's conviction.

true

explanation:

agreeableness is a personality trait manifesting itself in individual behavioral characteristics that are perceived as kind, sympathetic, cooperative, warm, and considerate.

is this supposed to be a question