Grant and sherman used the strategy of total war. do you think the end justifies the means? that is did defeting the confederacy just harmin civilians

Grant and Sherman used the strategy of total war to shorten the war in their favor, using the many deaths of enemies to save lives on their side. We may never know if more would've died if they didn't use the tactic, but in my opinion civilian lives were not theirs to take. Soldiers agreed to die, but civilians didn't, making total war, in my opinion, not right. Others may say that their lives were a necessary sacrifice towards a common goal, but, in my opinion, if one side uses total war, can't the other side use it too for a horrible end? Form your own opinion, but that is mine.

1.world in spatial terms2.places and regions 3.human systems4.physical systems5.geography and it's uses6.environment and society

This link explains it