subject
Social Studies, 13.04.2021 20:50 owo73

The following evidence was gathered to support the argument that economists deal with more than just money. Economics is also the study of people (as consumers) making choices about which goods and services to buy.
As such, economics helps illustrate how people interact within the market to realize their diverse goals.
So perhaps when it comes to economists, a more fitting question might be: What don't economists do?
Is this evidence adequate support for the idea? Why or why not?
Answers:
A
Yes. Options 1 and 2 provide readers with necessary background and option 3 is directly supportive.
B
Yes. The evidence provides a variety of examples of things that economists do unrelated to money.
C
No. Option 3 is excellent evidence to use, but options 1 and 2 are too similar to support the argument.
D
No. The evidence provided is not specific or thorough enough to fully support the argument.


The following evidence was gathered to support the argument that economists deal with more than jus

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:40
Pollution from a factory that produces cleaning products is an_
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:40
Skeleton and keyword outlines are most appropriate for what speech style? extemporaneous impromptu manuscript memorized
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30
Which organelle is marked with an x?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:10
Griffin correctly concludes that the coordinate pair for the russian federation is an influential point, because removing the russian federation from the relationship will significantly change the trend of the regression line. is an influential point, because removing the russian federation from the relationship will not significantly affect the estimated coefficient of determination of the regression line. is not an influential point, because the russian federation does not have the highest cvdir of all 1111 nations in the scatterplot. is an influential point, because removing the russian federation from the relationship will not significantly affect the estimated slope of the regression line. is not an influential point, because the russian federation has a positive residual in the least-squares linear regression.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
The following evidence was gathered to support the argument that economists deal with more than just...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 15.11.2020 08:30
question
Mathematics, 15.11.2020 08:30
question
Mathematics, 15.11.2020 08:30
Questions on the website: 13722363