Angela is driving her friend Kara to a party when Kara asks her to stop at a convenience store for some breath mints. Angela, who thinks Kara is just purchasing the mints, waits in the car. Kara is actually holding up the store with a gun she had hidden in her purse. Without firing any shots, Kara takes the store's money and locks the clerk in a storeroom. She then calmly walks out, hiding the gun and money from Angela, and they continue on to the party. Police later arrest both women. Angela should be found guilty of: a. Conspiracy to commit robbery b. Robbery c. Aiding and abetting in the commission of a felony d. Nothing e. False imprisonment

D. Nothing

Explanation:

Angela is not guilty here. Te question tells us that she had no knowledge of her friends intentions. Her friend had the intention of robbing a store and even though angela drove the car, she did not know that a gun was concealed somewhere. If she had knowledge of these before hand, she would have been guilty of aiding and abetting a crime. But since she didn't, she is not guilty.

i’m   sure probably just geuss and see which one you can get right, i’m pretty sure it is the combination of goods and services

i am a priest who cares deeply about the church. i have been called here to explain my views on indulgences and other proposed reforms. i would like to explain why my views are consistent with the bible and are correct.