1.) which of the following examples are allowed under the lemon test? select all that apply.
a. financial aid for religious literature for religion classes in parochial schools
b. financial aid for student lunches in parochial schools
c. financial aid for religious icons and statues in parochial schools
d. financial aid for vision testing in parochial schools
2.) in holt vs. hobbs, what did the supreme court use as a basis for its decision?
a. holt was not a member of a recognized religion
b. the government was preventing holt from practicing his religion
c. the prison had a compelling interest in facilitating prisoner identification and stopping the flow of contraband.
d. the prison had failed to show its policy was the least restrictive means of furthering its compelling interest.
3.) which of the following does the free exercise clause of the first amendment protect?
a. teacher-lead prayer in schools
b. attending church
c. the establishment of a state religion
d. nurses reading the bible to patients in a public hospital

Lesson 4: Supreme Court on Religious Freedom

Explanation:

1. B.financial aid for student lunches in parochial schools

D.financial aid for vision testing in parochial schools

2. D. The prison had failed to show its policy was the least restrictive means of furthering its compelling interest.

3. B. attending church

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

aliens are not real, the myth was created about 700 years ago because people found markings in the field of their crops. also, no there were no aliens on the moon.

hope this ! give brainliest!