Which factor contributed to the great famine in ukraine?

The collection of farms contributes to the Great Famine in Ukraine

The Famine that killed millions of people as a result of Joseph Stalin’s policy of forced collectivization was known as Holodomor. The famine occurred between 1932 and lasts until 1933. The famine was a result of the radical economic changes that were put in place during the period of the industrialization of the Soviet Union.

Although the famine affects the major grain-producing regions within the Soviet Union, the area that experienced the heaviest losses was Ukraine because, at that time, Ukraine was the major area where agriculture was most productive.

The famine affected Ukraine’s farmers so badly that it became impossible for them to resist the collectivization and Ukraine was economy were traumatized during this period.

The policy implemented by Joseph Stalin to fund industrialization of the Soviet Union had a negative consequence on agriculture. Also, the increase in the Ukraine grain procurement quotas by Stalin in 1932 affected the farmers as there was no enough grain available for farmers. This policy led to the death of millions of farmers in Ukraine, many of whom dies of starvation.

Therefore, the collection of farms contributed to the Great Famine in Ukraine

LEARN MORE:

KEYWORDS:

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: