subject
Social Studies, 08.12.2019 21:31 uday50

“when andrew johnson took upon himself the duties of his high office he swore to obey the constitution and take care that the laws be faithfully executed. that, indeed, is and has always been the chief duty of the president of the united states. the duties of legislation and adjudicating [making a judgment on] the laws of his country fall in no way to his lot. to obey the commands of sovereign power of the nation, and to see that others should obey them, was his whole duty—a duty which he could not escape, and any attempt to do so would be in direct violation of his official oath…”

according to the quotation, why does stevens believe that johnson should be removed from office?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:30
Describe briefly about great sunil tiwari
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:00
The ideas of hammond are most clearly an example of which of the following mid-19th century developments? (5 points) the increasingly liberal nature of slavery after the south enforced stronger slave codes the growing use by northern antislavery activists of moral arguments the increasing number of freed slaves in southern states as a result of gradual emancipation laws the growing tendency of southern slaveholders to use the paternal ethos to justify slavery
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:30
Astudent receives a pell grant based on the_.a.satb.nasac.fafsad.act
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
“when andrew johnson took upon himself the duties of his high office he swore to obey the constituti...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2020 04:10
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2020 04:10
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2020 04:10
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2020 04:10
question
Biology, 05.12.2020 04:10
question
Mathematics, 05.12.2020 04:10
Questions on the website: 13722362