"i yield to the superior force of the united states of america. . to avoid any collision of armed forces and perhaps the loss of life, i do this under protest, and impelled by said force, yield my authority." —queen liliuokalani, letter to the united states government, 1893
use the quote to answer the question.
3. which of the following best explains why hawaii’s queen liliuokalani issued this statement? (1 point)
a. queen liliuokalani did not want to keep her authority in hawaii.
b. queen liliuokalani believed that hawaii would keep its full independence as part of the united states.
c. queen liliuokalani realized that trying to maintain hawaii’s independence could lead to armed conflict.
d. queen liliuokalani wanted to cooperate with the united states to increase hawaii's prosperity.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

i need more info !