David's history teacher asked him why so many german people complied with hitler's orders to systematically slaughter millions of innocent jews. david suggested that the atrocities were committed because the germans had become unusually cruel, sadistic people with abnormal and twisted personalities. use your knowledge of the fundamental attribution error and milgram's research on obedience to highlight the weaknesses of david's explanation.

If David's history teacher asked him why so many German people complied with Hitler's orders to systematically slaughter millions of innocent Jews, then David suggested that the atrocities were committed because the Germans had become unusually cruel, so the highlight of the weaknesses of David's explanation are the mankind will do the things they are told to do so and they are like fed up with what Hitler dictated them.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; women of color tend to be misrepresented as either "good girls" or "bad girls';