Describe the 1803 case of marbury v. madison. what was the outcome?

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

According to subpart d, research with children may be eligible for exemption when: the children will be asked to complete a surveythe research involves the use of educational teststhe children will be interviewed by the researcher.the research with children will involve participant observation with researcher interaction.

Which of these cities would be found in the most densely populated area on northern section of the map? a) beijing b) seoul c) shanghai d) tokyo