This is a verdict equivalent to a finding of guilty that establishes the defendant, although mentally ill, was an in sufficient possession of his or her faculties to be morally blameworthy for his or her acts?

There's actually a term for this known as " Guilty but Mentally Ill (GBMI)", although not sufficiently mentally ill so that he(she) can not be held accountable for his(her) actions, refers to a verdict of guilty but mentally ill is equal to a guilty verdict. It refers to perpetrators whose mental illness is insufficient to be free from criminal responsibility.

- "sack of constantinople, (april 1204). the diversion of the fourth crusade from the holy land to attack, capture, and pillage the byzantine city of constantinople divided and dissipated the efforts of the christians to maintain the war against the muslims. the fourth crusade was corrupted from its purpose early on."

- "the crusades were a series of religious wars undertaken by the latin church. the first crusade arose after a call to arms in 1095 sermons by pope urban ii. the first crusade unleashed a wave of impassioned, pious catholic fury, which was of constantinople, the capital of the christian-controlled byzantine empire."

< 3