Which of the following could be said about the sons of liberty?
they build an alliance between the american patriots and the british loyalists.
they were the main reason britain passed the stamp act and began taxing the american colonists.
they assisted the soldiers in the revolutionary war by providing much needed funds and weapons.
they gave american colonists a voice and a chance to actively participate in the independence movement.

They gave American colonists a voice and a chance to actively participate in the independence movement is the correct answer.

Explanation:

The sons of liberty was a secret organisation of the colonialist that protested against the British taxes and laws before the American Revolution began. At the time of revolution there were thirteen chapters of sons of liberty in all thirteen colonies. The group began as a small group in 1765 to protest against the Stamp Act, their motto was no taxation without representation. The protest against the stamp act was their first major action, and they harassed the stamp tax distributor who worked for the British government. Later this organisations started to attract people from all walks of life and gave American colonists a voice which later culminated into independence movement.

the correct answer is option c. elenita versus "early puerto rican decor" is the best example, out of all the options, of a cultural conflict. a cultural conflict is defined as what happens when different cultures, that have different values and believes, clash. elenita not liking or accepting the puerto rican style of decoration, would represent that she does not identify herself with the puerto rican culture, therefore does not want to have decorations influenced by that culture.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.