The supreme court ruled in miranda v. arizona that people (4 points) under arrest as juveniles have many of the same rights as adults accused of crimes have the right to a second trial upon request who cannot afford an attorney must be provided one by the state that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement

The answer is D. That are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement.

What rights does a suspected criminal have? In the case of Miranda v. Arizona, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police officers must read the Miranda warning to suspects before they are arrested. This warning explains that they have the right to speak to an attorney.

another answer from our community: let us first explain the meaning of "eternal truth" which is tomean, continuing forever or indefinitely. this being the case itcannot be changed, for truth is truth no matter what changes aremade to the structure of its explanation. however, as for religeons changin… (more)

answer; randomization;