How do natural law conceptions of sin and legalistic definitions of crime differ?

Definition of legalistic takes place at the common law or sin, a starting point which refers to disregard for religious or morals laws. Crime is characterized as the violation of individual rights based upon the modern conception of natural law. It is nature of the man to commit sin. Natural law, common law, and morals come from God, not from man. Natural laws are the only real laws, sin so basic but so deep that man try to neglect about how deeply the world break laws or commit sins. There’s no legal law of any nation if it breaks the natural laws of God. In other words, an unjust law is never legal.  Natural rights or “unalienable rights” derive from natural law. These are truths to manifest that all men are made equal, that are capable by their Creator with definite unalienable rights that includes liberty, pursuit of happiness and life. The right to life for an unborn child is also unalienable. Other natural rights are protected by the Bills of Rights, which includes press, religion and freedom of speech. True law descends from the natural rights to our life and not from the illogical. The natural right to privacy derives from physical exclusion. It should not be mistaken for the honor to punish imprudence. Our constitution derives authority from natural rights.

  i think colonial period |-/