subject
Social Studies, 23.04.2021 19:10 maleah12x

Matthew, a vibrant leader, heads a team that launches new products into the market. During a follow-up test of an electric-car prototype produced by his company, the researchers find a problem with the engine of the car and request Matthew to halt the launch. However, Matthew goes ahead, and his company earns a bad reputation in the market because of the defective product. In the context of Janis's groupthink symptoms, which of the following symptoms led Matthew to make the wrong judgment? A) mindguards
B) unanimity illusion
C) invulnerability illusion
D) stereotyped view of the opponent

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:00
If a college student broke into a rival school in the neighboring town and damaged property in one of the computer labs, the case will most likely be heard by a?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:50
Abill in the texas legislature that would allow a county to establish a new community college would be classified as a
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
Why does c. wright mills identify critical thinking as one of the most important criteria for the development of intellectual craftsmanship? why is constantly being aware of the biased nature of your reactions and interactions (what c. wright mills calls self-reflexive) key to the development of that critical thinking? finally, why is keeping a file important, how can it lean to intellectual curiosity which can foster critical thinking and to develop a keen analytical mind?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Matthew, a vibrant leader, heads a team that launches new products into the market. During a follow-...
Questions
question
English, 11.11.2020 17:50
question
Mathematics, 11.11.2020 17:50
question
Geography, 11.11.2020 17:50
Questions on the website: 13722363