Read the passage from Prince Shotoku’s constitution. Respect the three treasures: the Buddha, the Buddhist law, and the Buddhist priesthood. They are the shelter that all people require. All people can learn these truths, no matter their past behavior.
—The Seventeen-Article Constitution, Prince Shotoku

What does the passage reveal about the influence of China on medieval Japan?

A- Japan as a whole rejected Buddhist influences and spiritual practices.

B- Farmers and workers practiced Buddhism, but the ideas were not embraced by elites

C- Shintoism was eventually replaced by Buddhist practices in the japanese court.

D- The practices of Buddhism influenced the japanese government during Prince Shotoku's reign

Explain what commentary austen is making about social conversation based on this excerpt. your answer should be at least 150 words.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

If an individual takes an instrument believing it was intended as an honest transaction, then he or she will qualify as a holder in due course based on which of the following requirements? without notice of defect for value no evidence of irregularity in good faith