As legend would have it, Rome was founded by the twin sons of Mars, the god of war. Their names were Romulus and Remus. The boys were placed in a basket on the Tiber River by a warrior king, who intended for them to drown. They were rescued, however, by a she-wolf, who raised them to be strong warriors. Upon learning the story of their birth, the twins fought with, and defeated, the king who tried to kill them as infants. They founded their own city on the river's banks in 753 B. C. Unfortunately, the twins did not always get along. Romulus killed his brother and became the first king of Rome, which is named for him. The twin boys were raised by a she-wolf
Romulus and Remus were some of the god of war, Mars
A warrior king wanted to kill the twin boys
The legendary founding of Rome

Dr. robbins wants to know if there are different opinions regarding the value of public school education between native americans who have at least one relative who attended indian boarding school and native americans who have no family experience with indian boarding school. dr. robbins contacts 35 native american participants in each group. he wants each group to include younger as well as older adults, and a mix of male and female participants. he asks each person to complete a survey about their attitudes toward public education. the design of this study is:

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Me fast do you think the outcome of this case would have been the same if president nixon hadclaimed national security needs rather than executive privilege? why or why not?