You meet Samuel at a party on campus, and he tells you that he enjoys building computers and robots, and loves math. You determine that Samuel must be an engineering student and not a liberal arts student, even though there are many more liberal arts students at your school. In making this judgment, you have: A. avoided using a representative heuristic. B. ignored diagnostic information and relied only on base-rate information. C. demonstrated base-rate neglect. D. established a gambler's fallacy.

B?

Explanation:

I think it's B because determining is only a natural way of predicting something. Basically, B is like.. somewhat saying that you used the information based on what you know about Samuel to predict that Samuel is an engineering student and not a liberal arts student.

this headline suggests that midterm congressional   elections are at the corner and trump administration wants to activate his base by vowing to clamp down on immigrants and immigration as trump had said during his election campaign around two years ago. when a baby is born in usa, the baby becomes citizen of usa for 85 years and trump wants to end this rule of birthright citizenship to control illegal immigration and this what he said in an interview""we’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the united states for 85 years, with all of those benefits,” "

is there multiple choice or do you need like an essay answer?