subject
Social Studies, 10.05.2021 22:50 592400014353

Please help! 4. Which set of events is in the correct chronological order?
5. Most of the battles during world war 2 occurred in


Please help!

4. Which set of events is in the correct chronological order? 
5. Most of the battle

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
“dear sir: it is with great reluctance, i trouble you on a subject, which does not fall within your province; but it is a subject that occasions me more distress, than i have felt, since the commencement of the war; and which loudly demands the most zealous exertions of every person of weight and authority, who is interested in the success of our affairs. i mean the present dreadful situation of the army for want of provisions, and the miserable prospects before us, with respect to futurity. it is more alarming than you will probably conceive, for, to form a just idea, it were necessary to be on the spot. for some days past, there has been little less, than a famine in camp. a part of the army has been a week, without any kind of flesh, and the rest for three or four days. naked and starving as they are, we cannot enough admire the incomparable patience and fidelity of the soldiery, that they have not been ere this excited by their sufferings, to a general mutiny or dispersion. strong symptoms, however, discontent have appeared in particular instances; and nothing but the most acitive efforts every where can long avert so shocking a catastrophe.” what’s the central idea?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:30
What is alexander the great known for? select all the apply get who write all the answer gets brainliest
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:00
How is it possible for bruno and shmuel to have fun together and maintain their friendship
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 15:00
Norman jones, an economic historian at the university of utah, has described the views of the ancient greek philosopher aristotle on interest: aristotle defined money as a good that was consumed by use. unlike houses and fields, which are not destroyed by use, money must be spent to be used. there- fore, as we cannot rent food, so we cannot rent money. moreover, money does not reproduce. a house or a flock can produce new value by use, so it is not unreasonable to ask for a return on their use. money, being barren, should not, therefore, be expected to produce excess value. thus, interest is unnatural. what did aristotle mean in arguing that money is “barren”? why would money being barren mean that lenders should not charge interest on loans? do you agree with aristotle’s reasoning? briefly explain.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Please help! 4. Which set of events is in the correct chronological order?
5. Most of the b...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367