Social Studies, 22.05.2021 01:00 tryintopassenioryear

Can someone help me with these pls

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:30

Which best expresses the radical republican philosophy of reconstruction? a. the confederate states were conquered territories that should be ruled by military governors. b. the southern states actually never left the union. c. if ten percent of the voters of a state that had seceded took an oath of allegiance to the union, then it should be readmitted as a state.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:20

Using mr smith and his id, identify two potential internal validity threats that might affect the a—b design. tell me how that threat might impact conclusions in the a—b design. note #1: you cannot use maturation (since i already did that one for note #2: there are some mr smith id threats that won’t have much impact in a single case design.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:30

Thomas jefferson was alarmed by the fierce debate over warning americans about its threat to national unity. 1.) slavery 2.) the powers of congress 3.) the missouri compromise 4.) escaped slaves

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Can someone help me with these pls
...

Questions