subject
Social Studies, 28.05.2021 14:00 cbaublitz

What now is Right Attentiveness? "...the disciple is clearly conscious in his going and coming; clearly
conscious in looking forward and backward, clearly conscious in bending
and stretching, clearly conscious in eating, drinking, chewing and
tasting; clearly conscious in walking, standing, sitting, falling asleep and
awakening; clearly conscious in speaking and in keeping silent." -Buddha
5. According to Buddha, what is right attentiveness?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30
How did the growth of railroads american businesses expand
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50
Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:40
Compared with the executive and legislative branches
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:40
Chris, a master at office gossip and innuendo, says, "we know we have a corporate spy someplace in the organization, probably on the management team itself. there is no evidence that it is audrey. in fact, she's too clean, if you know what i mean. somebody should fire audrey; she's got to be the spy." by making this argument chris is actually engaging in (a) an appeal to emotion fallacy (b) a straw man fallacy (c) an appeal to ignorance fallacy (d) circular reasoning (e) an appeal to the mob fallacy
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
What now is Right Attentiveness? "...the disciple is clearly conscious in his going and coming; cle...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 22.11.2019 23:31
question
Mathematics, 22.11.2019 23:31
Questions on the website: 13722363