In Griswold v. Connecticut, on what did Justice Goldberg base his concurring opinion? the protection granted by the Constitution
the intention of the writers of the Constitution
the list of rights in the first eight amendments
the human rights safe from government intervention

The protection granted by the Constitution .

Explanation:

The 1965 Supreme Court case of Griswold v. Connecticut was about the rights of an individual (in this case, a married couple) in using contraceptive pills. This case pertains to the individual liberty to do what they want without any government restriction.

This ruling contradicted a Connecticut law that prohibits or illegalizes the use of "any drug, medicinal article, or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception..." Justice Arthur Goldberg ruled that this law cannot be justified and is unconstitutional, pointing out that the state has no right to intrude into a person's personal/ intimate affairs. He based his ruling on the Constitutional rights of individuals to be protected from such events, in this case, the protection of one’s privacy in marital affairs.

Thus, the correct answer is the first option.

intimacy, passion and commitment are the components of a interpersonal relationship emphasized in the triangular theory of love by robert sternberg.

the triangular theory of love says love can be comprehend as this componest form the vertices of a triangle.  

intimacy relates to feelings such as of closeness and connection;

passion relates the drives that brings people together, as physical attraction.

commitment relates to the being in a long-term relationship.

answer; sexual harassment prohibition act; is your answer,good luck