subject
Social Studies, 03.06.2021 14:00 CDMJ8320

It was this experience that Thoreau wrote about in an essay called "Civil Disobedience." In this essay, he argued that being moral and just came before allegiance to government. He wrote “If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law." He also felt that voting was not enough to ensure that the right thing be done. He wrote that "even voting for the right is doing nothing for it… A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance…" He felt that one had a moral responsibility to resist unjust laws. Which line from Part 1 best explains Thoreau's message? Thoreau began speaking against slavery in public, echoing the voices of freedmen like Frederick Douglass He was reportedly furious that any tax was paid on his behalf It was this experience that Thoreau wrote about in an essay called "Civil Disobedience." He felt that one had a moral responsibility to resist unjust laws.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:30
How did european immigrants of the late 1800s change american society
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30
Which factors slowed population growth in china until the 1300? a. one child policy. b. urbanization c. epidemics. d. warfare
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:20
Amanda reiss was injured at a wedding reception at a private home. amanda tripped over a piece of rebar that was sticking from the end of one portion of a sidewalk leading to the front door. amanda's lawyer believes that the homeowners were aware of the rebar problem and that other guests to the home had tripped over it but not been injured. how can amanda's lawyer get the information about the homeowner's knowledge? a. he cannot because they are not required to talk with amanda's lawyers b. he can depose the homeowners c. he can depose others who have been guests d. both b and c
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
In what ways did the compromise of 1850 and the kansas-nebraska act of 1854 differ from the missouri compromise? both compromises used the established 36°30′ parallel to determine if territories would become free or slave states. both compromises used the mason-dixon line to determine if the territories would become free or slave states. both compromises let territories use popular sovereignty to determine if they would become free or slave states. both compromises only granted congress the power to determine if territories would become free or slave states.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
It was this experience that Thoreau wrote about in an essay called "Civil Disobedience." In this ess...
Questions
question
Biology, 14.03.2020 05:06
question
Mathematics, 14.03.2020 05:06
Questions on the website: 13722361