Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00
John lennon and paul mccartney belonged to this group
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:20
Using mr smith and his id, identify two potential internal validity threats that might affect the a—b design. tell me how that threat might impact conclusions in the a—b design. note #1: you cannot use maturation (since i already did that one for note #2: there are some mr smith id threats that won’t have much impact in a single case design.
Answers: 1
Những đặc điểm trong sáng tác của Lev Tolstoy...
Mathematics, 23.10.2020 08:01
English, 23.10.2020 08:01
History, 23.10.2020 08:01
Computers and Technology, 23.10.2020 08:01
English, 23.10.2020 08:01
Mathematics, 23.10.2020 08:01
History, 23.10.2020 08:01
Mathematics, 23.10.2020 08:01
Mathematics, 23.10.2020 08:01
Social Studies, 23.10.2020 08:01
Mathematics, 23.10.2020 08:01
Mathematics, 23.10.2020 08:01
Health, 23.10.2020 08:01
English, 23.10.2020 08:01