Tammy is conducting her experiment using different instructions for the two groups being compared. But she keeps the material to be learned, the location of the experiment, and the temperature all the same. Tammy is using the control technique of Group of answer choices elimination counterbalancing including constants randomization

How did the southeast asia treaty organization (seato) carry out the united states policy on containment? a. seato promoted the creation of united nation military bases to create regional defense. b. seato founded an organization seeking to educate southeastern asian countries on communism. c. seato established a regional economic union to promote monetary security. d. seato sought to provide regional security in southeast asia by establishing alliances.

Why would someone who is studying the history or culture of this time. find this text interesting important or useful?

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.