subject
Social Studies, 06.07.2021 17:00 najeezubair0666

Post your explanation of what you think the social workers wanted to know when they designed thepre/posttest for evaluating the parenting classes. Be sure to address the concept of attrition andwhether or not you believe they took that into account. Be sure to explain why. Then, analyzepotential lessons learned from attrition. Finally, explain how you might design a study to gather dataabout the eff ectiveness of these parenting classes. Use the following questions to focus yourthinking: Would you recommend a pre-experimental, experimental, or quasi-experimental design?
Would the study involve measurement over time?
Would there be a control group? 0 In this group research design you imagine, what or who will be compared?
What limitations in terms of generalizability and internal validity can you anticipate based on the research plan you envision?
What can you tell the social worker about the issue of client drop out (also called attrition or experimental mortality)?
If there is no control group, what type of research design could answer the question:
Is this parent training class effective in reducing abusive parenting practices?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30
People with high cq motivation enjoy interacting with people from other cultures and are likely to deal with the stress of living in another culture. tend to negotiate more aggressively during negotiations. build cooperation by reciprocating information sharing during negotiations. are very good at leveraging the s& o model which they do by leveraging equivalent offers.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:40
The form the boundary between north and south china. a. himalayan mountains c. change river b. xi river d. qinling shandi mountains
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30
Recall that in one condition of the experiment conducted by stasser and titus (1985) about student council president candidates, all group members had access to the same information, and that in another condition, members had unique information that other group members didn't know. in the second (unshared information) condition, the group made a worse decision than in the first (shared information) condition. this occurred because groups seldom can agree on who is most expert. focus discussion on the information that all members know. often ignore dissenting opinions. avoid differences of opinion, given conformity pressures.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:30
According to the article 13 of the articles of confederation,what percentage of votes by the states was required to ratify any amendments
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Post your explanation of what you think the social workers wanted to know when they designed thepre/...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.11.2019 22:31
question
English, 18.11.2019 22:31
Questions on the website: 13722367