Determine whether this argument is using deductive or inductive reasoning. Then evaluate the argument as either valid/invalid or strong/weak. The rainfall in Washington has been more than 20 inches annually for the past 10 years. Accordingly, the rainfall next year will probably be more than 20 inches. Group of answer choices Inductive, strong Deductive, valid Inductive, weak Deductive, invalid

Inductive, weak

Explanation:

An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.

The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".

the federal government of the united states was established by the constitution. us is a presidential republic. the president is head of state, head of government and of a two party legislative and electoral system. the supreme court balances the powers of the federal and the state government. yhe executive branch is headed by the oresident. there are two chambers of congress, the senate and the house of representatives. judicial power is exercised by the judicial branch (or judiciary), comprised of the supreme court and lower federal courts. the judiciary's function is to interpret the   constitution as well as the federal laws and regulations.

answer; interpreting someone's past consistent with present deviance;