Social Studies, 27.07.2021 16:00 love123jones

A defendant was charged with the sale of narcotics. At his trial, the prosecution planned on calling as witnesses the police officer who investigated the crime, an eyewitness to the crime, a desk officer to testify regarding chain of custody, and a former co-defendant who had reached a plea agreement with the prosecution. The defendant demanded, as a matter of right, that each of these individuals be excluded from the courtroom to prevent them from hearing the testimony of the other witnesses. The prosecution objected to removing any of these individuals from the courtroom. Which of the following individuals should the judge order be removed from the courtroom? A. The eyewitness only.
B. The eyewitness and the former co-defendant only.
C. The eyewitness, the former co-defendant, and the desk officer, but not the investigating officer.
D. The eyewitness, the former co-defendant, the desk officer, and the investigating officer.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:00

How can congress clarify parts of the constitution that are unclear?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:00

Of the following choices, which ones are characteristics of west african society? select all that apply. a. arabic was the main language used when trading with other societies. b. christianity was the only religion practiced in villages. c. slaves had no rights and were only given specific farming tasks. d. skilled workers were a higher level in the caste system than traders. e. religious rituals encouraged the honoring of ancestors.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50

Astudy that involves interviews of adults is eligible for expedited review. the researcher wants to add an adolescent population (aged 12 to 17) to the study and has designed a parental permission and assent process. no additional changes are planned. which of the following statements about review of the revised protocol is accurate? the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents are capable of understanding the same consent forms used for the adult population.the research would only be eligible for expedited review if the adolescents have been declared to be emancipated minors.the new research would need full review by a convened irb because children are a protected population.unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to > minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:50

When arriving at a navigation lock what is the order of priority

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

A defendant was charged with the sale of narcotics. At his trial, the prosecution planned on calling...

Questions