subject
Social Studies, 03.08.2021 03:50 danksans7011

The police entered a neighborhood suffering from increased illegal drug activity, accompanied by a dog trained to sniff out cocaine. The police entered the backyard of a home and brought the dog to an area immediately outside the back door. The dog acted as if it smelled cocaine. The officers knocked on the back door and a man answered the door and let them in. He was immediately placed under arrest. After a brief search, the police officers found and confiscated a small quantity of cocaine from the bedroom closet. The man is charged with possession of cocaine. At trial, he moves to prevent introduction of the cocaine into evidence. This motion will most probably be:
(A) Granted, because, under the circumstances, the police activity violated the man's reasonable expectation of privacy.
(B) Granted, because this kind of detection by a trained dog has not been scientifically verified and cannot be the basis for probable cause.
(C) Denied, because the man allowed the police officers to enter his home.
(D) Denied, because the search was incident to a valid arrest.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 22:30
The purpose of a campaign is to get an official elected or .which statements apply to campaign finance and the laws controlling it? check all that apply.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00
Why did lincoln inform the confederacy that he would not e sending troops or weapons as food supplies were sent to fort sumter?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:40
The cause and events that led to civil rights
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The police entered a neighborhood suffering from increased illegal drug activity, accompanied by a d...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 27.08.2019 22:40
question
History, 27.08.2019 22:40
Questions on the website: 13722361