Help! I am working on a project in which I have to decide if my topic is a diplomatic event or a debate event or if it is a mixture of both. My topic is The end of Apartheid in South Africa and Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

People with high cq motivation enjoy interacting with people from other cultures and are likely to deal with the stress of living in another culture. tend to negotiate more aggressively during negotiations. build cooperation by reciprocating information sharing during negotiations. are very good at leveraging the s& o model which they do by leveraging equivalent offers.

Why is it difficult to determine which countries belong to europe and which belong to southwest asia