Argument A You should be extremely careful when handling a soldering iron. This is owing to the dangerous temperatures that can be reached by a soldering iron, and is evidenced by the many preventable injuries caused by soldering irons in the technical trade profession. In addition, this conclusion is for the reason that a little extra caution would have prevented a large number of these injuries.

The premise indicators in Argument A are _ _ and _

Argument B

As indicated by the fact that many great works have stood the test of time, it follows that future great works will also display similar staying power. This is because the future tends to resemble the past, and given that great books all have certain qualitative characteristics in common.

The premise indicators in Argument B are _ _ and _

Argument C

We now know that there are planets orbiting stars other than our own sun. We can conclude this because we have observed the regular but tiny wobble of other stars caused by a gravitational pull. Since we can easily observe the wobble of our own star due to the gravitational pull of the planets in our own solar system, we can infer this conclusion. Moreover, the presence of planets around other stars is now shown by direct photographic evidence.

The premise indicators in Argument C are _ _ and _

What was one important effect of the renaissance’s on europen culture?

Click on this article and use it to answer the questions below.article on china and controlling the media 1. according to the article, the chinese government has tried to control its people in all of the following ways except: question 1 options: create and spread propaganda in the mediacensorship of the mediaallowing people to create their own social mediadeleting people's social media posts without their permission

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.