COLLAPSE The concept of what is considered to be abnormal behavior has changed considerably over time and continues to evolve. With such change in the field of abnormal psychology comes the difficult task of categorizing and re-categorizing behavior as normal or abnormal. One example of a present day common behavior, that was not always considered normal, is body piercing. Multiple body piercings were a common ceremonial act in some cultures, yet considered abnormal and even barbaric in others. Present research continues to suggests that numerous body piercings may be a form of self-mutilation. Explain how multiple body piercings can be considered a form of self-mutilation or a form of self-expression. Can we use our bodies as a canvas to express ourselves or is it an indicator to mental illness

How did dynasties end and how did new ones start?

Dominic and stacy each have a stamp collection. dominic has six fewer stamps than three times the number of stamps stacy has. dominic and stacy decide to give all of their stamps to their younger sister, mary. if stacy had s stamps, which expression represents the number of stamps that mary received? a. (3s − 18)(3s − 6) b. 2s − 18 c. 4s − 6 d. 4s − 18

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.