French traders exploring the St. Lawrence River in colonial America encountered trappers from the Huron and Algonquin nations who possessed a variety of furs to trade. The French offered jewelry, beads, and other goods but the American Indians would only trade for firearms. The French explorers agreed to provide arms in exchange for furs, a relationship that lasted for many years. Is this an example of voluntary trade? Why or why not? A
Yes, because the French were able to acquire furs.

B
Yes, because both parties were satisfied with the trade.

C
No, because the goods that were traded were not of equal value.

D
No, because the American Indians limited what they would trade for.

is this an essay or multiple choice

your answer is "graduates" hope this

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

they protect against unsafe foods and medicines being sold

explanation: