Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which principle underlies the idea of limited govemment?
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:50
Abill in the texas legislature that would allow a county to establish a new community college would be classified as a
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
The fact that some sports teams have mascots that are associated with american indian stereotypes is an example of: a) the history of hate crimes b) the pain caused by racial equality c) the costs associated with hate crimes d) the legacy of racism
Answers: 2
Is the mayflower compact a significant document?? Why?...
Mathematics, 06.07.2021 16:50
Mathematics, 06.07.2021 16:50
Computers and Technology, 06.07.2021 16:50
Mathematics, 06.07.2021 16:50
English, 06.07.2021 16:50
Mathematics, 06.07.2021 16:50
History, 06.07.2021 16:50
History, 06.07.2021 16:50
Mathematics, 06.07.2021 16:50
Chemistry, 06.07.2021 16:50
Mathematics, 06.07.2021 16:50
Mathematics, 06.07.2021 16:50