100 points with brainliest & ill answer your questions you've posted! Complete a paragraph explaining which principle you think had the greatest influence on the conflict between the American colonists and the British government. Use supporting details as evidence from your lessons. (at least 5 sentences )

The French and Indian War, (1756-1763), brought new territories under the power of the crown, but the expensive conflict lead to new and unpopular taxes.

Attempts by the British government to raise revenue by taxing the colonies met with heated protest among many colonists who resented their lack of representation in Parliament and demanded the same rights as other British subjects.

Colonial resistance led to violence in 1770, when British soldiers opened fire on a mob of colonists, killing five men in what was known as the Boston Massacre.

After December 1773, when a band of Bostonians dressed as Mohawk Indians boarded British ships and dumped 342 chests of tea into Boston Harbor during the Boston Tea Party.

An outraged Parliament passed a series of measures designed to reassert.

It is a greatest influence on the conflict between the American colonists and the British government

I shall go with Boston tea party.

After 100years war between france and England,to cover the poverty established due to war ,British started stamp fee on US in the year 1765.

It is unbearable .

Because you have to pay very huge amount for buying stamps and posting.

In the anger of this US colony citizens started protesting.

In 1767 some people attacked on a tea cruise at Boston port and threw down all tea bags to sea .

It was a great loss to British

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

portugal is the westernmost country in europe.