n the United States, MOST emerging adults believe that sexual fidelity: is important for an enduring relationship. is not important in any relationship. is not a reasonable expectation to have in relationships outside of marriage. is not common in most relationships.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

should congress have the power to interpret the constitution? write a paragraph in which you argue for or against the wide application of the limplied power

in order to keep competitors from increasing or decreasing the prices they may establish, usa in the period of 70s set very democratic price - abut 1 dollar per gasoline so that their offer will be more affordable and attractive.