A researcher pretest a group of participants to determine their attitudes toward the use of alternative energy sources to replace crude oil. The researcher then initiates a program to convince them that they should invest in such alternatives. During this time, the price of gasoline rises $.50 per gallon. At the end of the program, The researcher retestes and finds that the participants are much more positive in their attitudes. What threat to internal validity most likely accounts for this change? A. History
B. Maturation
C. Testing
D. Regression toward the mean

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

the chart shows a production possibilities schedule for sabrina’s soccer.

the schedule shows the - combination-   of goods the business can produce.

for edgenuit.

it is a better alternative

well this isn't a question but if you are asking if it is true or false it is, true.