subject
Social Studies, 06.12.2021 16:30 aero8030

Use your knowledge about fallacies of presumption, fallacies of ambiguity, and fallacies of illicit transference to determine which, if any, of the following statements are true. 1. The fallacy of composition is committed when the conclusion of an argument depends on the mistaken transfer of an attribute from a whole thing to the parts of that thing.
2. An arguer may commit the begging the question fallacy by simply restating a questionable premise in slightly different language.
3. The fallacy of amphiboly usually involves an ambiguous use of language by someone other than the arguer, whereas the fallacy of equivocation typically involves the arguer's own ambiguous use of language.
4. An arguer often commits the equivocation fallacy by ignoring questionable premises.
6. The fallacies of presumption occur because the premises are irrelevant to the conclusion.
7. The fallacies of ambiguity include equivocation. The fallacies of illicit transference include complex question.
8. The fallacies of illicit transference arise from an ambiguity in either the premises or conclusion of an argument.
9. The fallacies of presumption include complex question.
10. The fallacies of illicit transference include begging the question.
111. If an argument mistakenly transfers an attribute from the parts to the whole of something, then the arguer commits the fallacy of composition.
12. The fallacy of false dichotomy is committed when multiple questions are posed in the guise of a single question, so as to invite a single answer to more than one question.
13. The fallacy of suppressed evidence is committed when an arguer ignores important evidence that may outweigh evidence that is otherwise presented in the premises.
14. The fallacy of division is committed when the conclusion of an argument depends on the mistaken transfer of an attribute from the parts of something to the whole of that thing.
15. The fallacy of false dichotomy occurs when a disjunctive premise presents two alternatives as though they were jointly exhaustive, when in fact other likely alternatives are available.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:50
The provisions of subpart d, of the hhs regulations, additional protections for children involved as subjects in research apply to: all research involving childrenall research that is > minimal riskall research funded by any federal agencyall research funded by hhs
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30
Lyle is concerned about the difference between a company's salaries for its white workers and its colombian workers. in order to place economic pressure on the company, what does lyle need to do?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:30
The year is 1776. the family of philosopher john locke has brought a lawsuit against thomas jefferson for copying locke's ideas. locke's family claim that jefferson's "declaration of independence" plagiarizes locke's ideas from two treatises on government. you are the judge ruling on the case. you must research how jefferson's ideas compare to locke's and determine whether or not jefferson is guilty of stealing locke's ideas. your paragraph opinion (a court document explaining how you arrived at your decision on a case) should contain the following: explain at least 2 ideas of jefferson and locke that are similar explain at least 1 idea of jefferson that is different from locke's determine whether or not jefferson is guilty of plagiarism explain why or why not ~~ you don't have to do the work for me but i really would like some with this, you ! ( if you would like to do it for me that's great too : )
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:40
The cause and events that led to civil rights
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Use your knowledge about fallacies of presumption, fallacies of ambiguity, and fallacies of illicit...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.05.2021 16:20
question
Mathematics, 18.05.2021 16:20
Questions on the website: 13722362