Furniture Now is a store that rents furniture to low-income individuals, and these individuals take title to the furniture after having paid the cost of the furniture (which is often overpriced with high interest rates). Hazel, an elderly low-income person, has rented and purchased a living room set, a dining room set, and a bedroom set from Furniture Now. Hazel rents an HD television from Furniture Now and signs a contract that states that if Hazel falls more than three months behind in her television payments, Furniture Now can recover all of the furniture she had previously purchased from the store as liquidated damages. Because the actual damages are clearly determinable in advance and the liquidated damages are excessive and unconscionable, this liquidated damages clause would be considered a .

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

okay what's the question?

answer; knowledge,reason,and judgement;

answer; /// the statement is false,false,false;