subject

SAQ "The members of the Philadelphia convention which drafted the Constitution were, with a
few exceptions, immediately, directly, and personally interested in, and derived economic
advantages from, the establishment of the new system. The Constitution was essentially
an economic document based upon the concept that the fundamental private rights of
property are [superior] to government and morally beyond the reach of popular
majorities.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event, development, or circumstance in the period 1776-1800 that is not directly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Beard's interpretation.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00
Which shows the best path to find the number of centimeters in 1 yard?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:30
Describe the difference between native american beliefs about land "ownership" and european beliefs. savestylesformat instructions
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31
Does the truman show overstate the power and influence of the mass media?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
SAQ "The members of the Philadelphia convention which drafted the Constitution were, with a
...
Questions
question
Health, 15.04.2021 01:30
question
Mathematics, 15.04.2021 01:30
question
Mathematics, 15.04.2021 01:30
question
Mathematics, 15.04.2021 01:30
Questions on the website: 13722367