Social Studies, 11.12.2021 07:10 jakhunter354

Topic: Westward Expansion I need 5 out of 8 questions answered

WHAT DOES THIS QUOTE MEAN TO YOU? “THEY MADE US MANY PROMISES, MORE THAN I CAN REMEMBER . BUT THEY KEPT BUT ONE, THEY PROMISED TO TAKE OUR LAND AND THEY TOOK IT.”

HOW DID TREATIES IMPACT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE NATIVES AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE/ GOVERNMENT?

WHOSE SIDE WOULD YOU HAVE TAKEN DURING THIS TIME? EXPLAIN.

WHAT IS A QUESTION YOU HAVE FOR THE NATIVE PEOPLE?

WHAT IS A QUESTION YOU HAVE FOR THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT?

WHY ARE THE TREATIES CONSIDERED ‘ONE SIDED”? EXPLAIN

HOW DID PRESIDENT JACKSON VIEW THE NATIVES? WHY?

HOW DID THE SUPREME COURT PLAY A ROLE AT THIS TIME?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00

What does it mean to say that "service sector" jobs are predominant in europe's mixed economies today? a. that jobs where people work in factories predominate b. that jobs where people do something for others predominate c. that jobs where people work the land predominate d. that jobs in government predominate

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:40

Why did the whiskey rebellion protest?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00

According to the law of supply,suppliers want to sell their product at prices

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Topic: Westward Expansion I need 5 out of 8 questions answered

WHAT DOES THIS QUOTE M...

Questions