as a student talks to her psychology professor, the professor explains that the way she usually conducts research is by measuring the frequency of lever presses by rats, and examining how different kinds of rewards and punishments increase or decrease the frequency of the lever presses. she also explains that according to the theory she works to test, there is little to no need to appeal to how the rats’ "minds" are working. rather, she can explain all lever-pressing simply as a function of the external environment in which the rat finds itself. the professor comes from the perspective.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; ///(3) three parts;

answer; human capital;