A woman hired a personal trainer to help her lose weight. In addition to enforcing a rigorous workout regimen, the trainer gave the woman appetite suppressant pills that the trainer claimed to have formulated himself. The trainer told the woman that the pills contained a combination of natural herbs that would safely curb her food cravings. The trainer did not charge the woman for the pills. The woman took the pills for a week. Although she stopped having food cravings, she also started to feel dizzy and had a hard time breathing. The woman showed the pills to a pharmacist, who identified them as store-bought pills containing a drug that suppressed one's appetite but had potentially dangerous side effects such as dizziness, headaches, and respiratory difficulty. The woman immediately stopped taking the pills, and within a day she stopped feeling dizzy and having difficulty breathing. If the woman files suit against the trainer for intentional misrepresentation, will she succeed? a. Yes, because she suffered dangerous side effects when she took the pills.
b. Yes, because she relied on the trainer's false assertion that the pills were safe.
c. No, because the pills helped suppress the woman's appetite.
d. No, because she suffered no actual economic loss.