How do candidates use rhetoric to sway voters? 25 pts

These are my own words:

Candidates use rhetoric to sway voters by using language to appeal to the public. They use methods such as ethos, pathos, and logos to make imagery that can be used effectively. For example, ethos can be used effectively by reminding the audience what expertise the candidate is. Pathos can be used effectively by appealing to the emotions of the audience. For example, a candidate can make the audience feel sorry for a global problem, which can make them support the candidate. Logos can be used effectively by connecting logical ideas. For example, when the candidate uses graphs and visual images, it can strengthen his argument. Today, many candidates use many rhetorical strategies to strengthen their views from the audience.

Explanation: Brainliest plz?

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )