A bank properly filed an action in federal district court to collect on an overdue promissory note. The defendant, who was the alleged maker of the note, asserted in his answer that the signature on the note was a forgery. The answer was prepared, submitted, and signed by his attorney. The bank timely filed a summary judgment motion. As part of the motion, the bank, in addition to attaching the note, attached an affidavit by a bank officer in which the officer swore that she had witnessed the signing of the note and that the signer had been the defendant. The defendant replied to the motion by noting the statement in his answer that he had not signed the note. Determining that there were other issues in dispute, the court refused to grant a partial summary judgment with respect to the issue of forgery. Was the court's denial of a partial summary judgment with respect to the issue of forgery correct?