Social Studies, 15.03.2022 21:30 sherlock19

Why was miller brought before the house of un-american activities committee.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:30

What was included in most state constitutions that guaranteed protection of individual liberties based upon common law?

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00

Who won the debate over ratifying the constitution

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Why was miller brought before the house of un-american activities committee....

Questions