In ics, the members of the command staff assume the title of:

Troy is the ceo of a manufacturing company, and he is planning to open a new factory in his community.because the new factory will require heavier traffic from delivery trucks and employees' cars, troy is partnering with the city to expand and rebuild roadways in the neighborhood.as part of opening the factory, he also plans to create a new hiring program. because he wants his workers to gain skills, he will also offer them the opportunity to attend college courses to receive business training. which of these outcomes are possible negative externalities? check all that apply. increased traffic in the neighborhood surrounding the factory better roads for drivers in the area more educated workers in the community pollution from trucks making deliveries to the factory new job opportunities in the city

Which three sentences in the story indicate that the passage is an ex nihilism type of creation story?

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?